Asessment Rubric for Critical Remix Assignment
|
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
|
|
Knowledge and Understanding |
||||
|
Knowledge of content
Different types of remixes, copyright law, ethical considerations
|
Demonstrates limited knowledge of different remix types, copyright basics, and ethical considerations related to remixing.
|
Demonstrates some knowledge of remix types, copyright law, and ethical considerations, but may struggle to apply them in practice.
|
Demonstrates a good understanding of different types of remixes, copyright law, and ethical considerations. Can accurately identify and explain these concepts.
|
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of remix types, copyright law, and ethical considerations, providing insightful explanations and demonstrating a nuanced understanding of the complexities.
|
|
Understanding of content
Purpose and impact of remixing, the relationship between remixing and the original work
|
Shows a limited understanding of the purpose and impact of remixing and struggles to analyze the relationship between the remix and the original work.
|
Demonstrates some understanding of the purpose and impact of remixing, but explanations may be superficial. Can identify some connections between the remix and the original work.
|
Shows a good understanding of the purpose and impact of remixing and can effectively analyze the relationship between the remix and the original work, considering the changes and their significance.
|
Demonstrates a thorough and insightful understanding of the purpose and impact of remixing, critically analyzing the relationship between the remix and the original work. Can identify subtle connections and implications.
|
|
Thinking |
||||
|
Use of planning skills Selecting appropriate source material, determining the type of remix, planning the critical message |
Demonstrates limited planning in selecting source material, determining the remix type, and developing the critical message. The choices appear random and lack clear justification.
|
Demonstrates some planning in selecting source material, determining the remix type, and developing the critical message. Choices show some thought, but connections could be clearer and more purposeful.
|
Planning is evident in the strategic selection of source material, thoughtful choice of remix type, and well-developed critical message. Choices are justified and demonstrate an understanding of their impact.
|
Planning and research are highly effective, demonstrated by the insightful selection of source material, careful consideration of the remix type, and sophisticated development of the critical message. Choices demonstrate a deep understanding of the topic and the goals of the project.
|
| Use of processing skills
Analyzing the original work, evaluating the effectiveness of the remix in communicating the critical message |
Analysis of the original work is superficial and the evaluation of the remix lacks depth and critical engagement.
|
Demonstrates some critical analysis of the original work and evaluates the effectiveness of the remix, but insights could be more developed.
|
Provides a thoughtful analysis of the original work and critically evaluates the effectiveness of the remix in communicating the critical message.
|
The analysis of the original work is insightful and connects to broader themes and ideas. The evaluation of the remix is thorough and demonstrates sophisticated critical thinking, considering the strengths and weaknesses of the approach.
|
|
Use of critical/creative thinking processes
Exploring different perspectives, developing a creative and impactful critical message, reflecting on the process and its implications
|
The critical message lacks depth and creativity and fails to offer alternative perspectives or explore the implications of the remix.
|
Demonstrates some creativity in the critical message and explores some alternative perspectives, but the reflection on the process is limited.
|
The critical message is creative and effectively conveys alternative perspectives on the chosen issue. The student demonstrates meaningful reflection on the process and its implications.
|
The critical message is highly creative and insightful, offering fresh perspectives and demonstrating a strong understanding of persuasive techniques. The reflection on the process is thorough and insightful, exploring the complexities of remixing and its impact.
|
|
Communication |
||||
|
Expression and organization of ideas and information Clarity, logic, coherence of the remix and the written paper
|
The remix and written paper are disorganized and lack clarity and coherence. Ideas are presented in a jumbled manner, making it difficult to follow the message and understand the creative choices.
|
The remix and written paper demonstrate some organization and clarity, but communication could be more concise and impactful. The connection between the remix and the paper could be stronger.
|
The remix and written paper are well-organized and effectively communicate ideas and processes. The relationship between the two is clear and purposeful, with each element supporting the overall critical message.
|
The remix and written paper are exceptionally clear, engaging, and impactful. They effectively communicate the complexities of the issue being addressed and the creative choices made in the remixing process. The connection between the two components is seamless, creating a cohesive and persuasive message.
|
| Communication for different audiences and purposes |
The remix and written paper do not demonstrate consideration of the target audience or the specific platform being used.
|
Shows some awareness of the target audience and the platform, but choices could be more effective in tailoring the message.
|
The remix and written paper effectively target the intended audience and demonstrate an understanding of the considerations for different platforms.
|
The remix and written paper are masterfully adapted for the target audience and platform, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of communication strategies and persuasive techniques.
|
|
Use of conventions
|
The written paper demonstrates limited use of appropriate terminology and contains errors in grammar and mechanics that hinder understanding.
|
The written paper shows some effort to use correct terminology, but there may be errors in grammar and mechanics that occasionally distract the reader.
|
The written paper uses appropriate terminology effectively and demonstrates good control of grammar and mechanics. The writing is clear and professional.
|
The written paper demonstrates a strong command of language and terminology, effectively conveying complex ideas with precision and clarity. The writing is polished and error-free.
|
|
Application |
||||
|
Application of knowledge and skills in familiar contexts
Using remixing techniques, applying copyright law and ethical guidelines |
The project demonstrates limited application of remixing techniques, copyright law, and ethical guidelines. The remix may misuse source material or fail to properly attribute sources.
|
Demonstrates some application of remixing techniques, copyright law, and ethical guidelines, but there may be inconsistencies or oversights.
|
The project successfully applies knowledge and skills related to remixing techniques, copyright law, and ethical considerations. The remix demonstrates a clear understanding of the relevant principles.
|
The project demonstrates sophisticated application of remixing techniques, copyright law, and ethical guidelines, resulting in a polished and responsible remix that effectively communicates the intended message.
|
| Transfer of knowledge and skills
Adapting the remix for a different audience or platform, reflecting on the broader implications of remix culture
|
The project lacks adaptability and does not consider the implications of remixing for different contexts or audiences.
|
Demonstrates some adaptability, but the project could be more effectively adapted for other contexts or audiences.
|
The remix and accompanying analysis can be successfully adapted for different audiences or platforms while maintaining the core message and ethical considerations. The student shows an understanding of the broader implications of remix culture.
|
The project demonstrates a high degree of adaptability and insightful reflection. The remix seamlessly transitions between different contexts while remaining relevant and effective. The student critically evaluates the broader implications of remix culture for creative expression, copyright law, and ethical practices.
|
|
Making connections
Making connections within and between various contexts
|
Has limited success in connecting the remix to broader social or political issues, considering the cultural significance of remixing |
Has some success in connecting the remix to broader social or political issues, considering the cultural significance of remixing
|
Has considerable success in connecting the remix to broader social or political issues, considering the cultural significance of remixing
|
Has a high degree of success in connecting the remix to broader social or political issues, considering the cultural significance of remixing
|